Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

Revenue back to purchase nouns is a good intention, 

Personal preference would to see either the % returned in single bid. 
Even if that meant noun 1453 was purchased for 10.7e a 80% increase on noun 1452.

Thus keep your voting block in parity to the Dao, and not just accumlating  a controlling voting block with recycling Dao funded revenue. 

Maybe ensuring your Dao funded project had the appropriate nouns required to facilitate sponsoring props on chain. At a maximum. 

I wouldn't be excited seeing a project that became an extremely profitable venture turn into the controlling voting block because they signalled we will return x amount to purchasing nouns. 

@oshi

Founder @ /atrium  (atrium.art) . Making nouns.movie ⌐◨-◨

Good in your area shouldn’t overcome the dao to your direction only. Lead by example not by voting power. Just my opinion. A simple plumber with shit for brains 🧠

its a good question. 

Shouldn’t profitable ventures out of the dao have better voice in how funds are spent? I personally would prefer it tbh

Tired - profit split with DAO
Wired - buying Nouns with profit
Inspired - committing to delegate to a large voting body (ie Nouncil, Shark, Yellow, etc)

Hospitality. ⌐◨-◨ Nouns Deli, Melb / Nounsdeli.com

People have returned personal comp for nouns purchased. A few mint proposals have returns eth.

Good topic of conversation. 

Proposals being able to contribute back to the treasury is an obvious win. 

The right mechanism is yet to be explored. Is there/ I’m unaware of a proposal who has been able to do this yet?