Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Ben
@jarmen
Revenue back to purchase nouns is a good intention, Personal preference would to see either the % returned in single bid. Even if that meant noun 1453 was purchased for 10.7e a 80% increase on noun 1452. Thus keep your voting block in parity to the Dao, and not just accumlating a controlling voting block with recycling Dao funded revenue. Maybe ensuring your Dao funded project had the appropriate nouns required to facilitate sponsoring props on chain. At a maximum. I wouldn't be excited seeing a project that became an extremely profitable venture turn into the controlling voting block because they signalled we will return x amount to purchasing nouns. @oshi
3 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
87Bones
@87bones
Good topic of conversation. Proposals being able to contribute back to the treasury is an obvious win. The right mechanism is yet to be explored. Is there/ Iβm unaware of a proposal who has been able to do this yet?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Ben
@jarmen
Cc @maty
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben
@jarmen
People have returned personal comp for nouns purchased. A few mint proposals have returns eth.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
