i stopped using farcaster for a while because i didn't agree with some of the protocol design decisions and how quickly warpcast was iterating on it.

but @yougogirl.eth rightfully pointed out to me that having A protocol infinitely better than having NO protocol.

to that i had no rebuttal 😂.

gm...

Growth is infinite. Work is worship.

/vv /opepen /checks

the new/future channel design vs sticking to the previous metadata or DNS records for example felt more like a business decision than a protocol decision

well said — what are the changes that you disagree with?

thanks Dan!

i just loved the notion of URI based channels and imho it "not working" was more an app issue than a protocol issue. i remember we had a ping pong about this back when the new spec was designed. https://warpcast.com/jalil/0xe7e28829

was very in line with the "global state" thinking as well imho (all/open global conversation about a given thing/topic/event (URI)). the "VV" channel could be all casts with a parentURI of visualizevalue dot com, with channel metadata and settings set via opengraph-style tags.

also i realize it's not really an either or - onchain ownable channels are useful for things like "travel", "cryptography", or "philosophy" i suppose.

love to hear you added more metadata placeholder features will check them out.

Internet OG ✨in 🗽 @base host /base-meetups founder @ombruja cryptobrujas.nft.nyc former VoIP consultant & VP Internet Society NYC

for example: https://warpcast.com/jalil/0x350349f8

Can you expand on this? What didn’t you agree on

🍕 logic
Any pizza is better than no pizza

well, i just got back on warpast today and I'm impressed

example of having no protocol: my X feed is all Trump and Elon , not good.