jacob
@jacob
I wonder which is more feasible, desirable and faster (may be a different answer for each): 1. Make mars human breathable and appropriate pressure 2. Modify humans such that we can survive on mars as is
8 replies
2 recasts
43 reactions
Richard 🎩 🔵
@richardleighton
Awesome question! Modifying humans would likely be more resource efficient and achievable in a shorter timeframe. Though, you’d still need some level of terraforming to grow food… so perhaps life on Mars would require both approaches!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sam
@sammdec.eth
I would vote 1,2,1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
#2 do you mean technologically or biologically
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
1. Feels more feasible, fix one problem once Modifying humans would require ongoing work and maintenance
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yorick
@yorick
1) first, and then maybe 2) to speed the timeline up a little. The atmosphere on Mars is so thin we’d experience it as a vacuum. So, need a thicker atmosphere first. A hyper-accelerated timeline is 1,000 years I believe - if we start now.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brandon
@fatherhood
Kardashians have already started the modification process.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Awkward Seal
@awkwardseal
Modifying humans feels more realistic.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
techgurueddie
@os25crevitaliza
Fascinating question! Making Mars breathable requires huge planetary engineering. Modifying humans might be quicker with biotech advances, but it's ethically complex. Desirability depends on your vision for humanity's future—adapting a planet or ourselves. Each path has its own intrigue!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
BrightFutureGuy 🎩↑Ⓜ️
@bfg
afraid - so far none unless we live thousand years
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Crypto Artist
@cryptoartistx
I would vote 3. 3.find solutions for humanity on earth.
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
