Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/flows
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rocketman
@rocketman
if we make a rough analogy to a company, flows is currently structured like a big inefficient company where employees and departments don't work together, they actively compete with each other. how can we restructure it so that people are working together on projects that drive revenue for the larger program?
5 replies
1 recast
17 reactions
Indeus.eth
@indeus
Interesting to think about positive sum games and network effects for FLOWS: Flows is great to find builder who can execute on small amounts of $ If more money and collaboration can be allocated to proven builders, I'd love to see a kind of "Investment Thesis/hackathon" to promote collaboration. Let's say you want to gather all beach cleaners of Mexico to collaborate to build tech, events, products, marketing, etc. Opening a call to collaborate with other flows builders with the potential upside of more funding makes sense to me.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
rocketman
@rocketman
how would a group of beach cleaners be better together than alone? should we try to get artists working with cleaners working with technologists? under what goals/conditions should we group people?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Indeus.eth
@indeus
It was just an example of builders within the same category. But when mixing disciplines I'd love to see tech builders with artists!!! Or game developers with storytellers Infinite possibilities if we gathering Nounish builders for greater projects.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
rocketman
@rocketman
what do you think one of these groups should work towards?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
