Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
meta-david 💥| Building Scoop3
@metadavid
I've never understood smaller brands/projects following 0 people I'm not sure if it's supposed to be some sort of flex or not wanting to show favoritism, but I'd say both reasons are mid at best It's a big price to pay for an opportunity to further cement your relationship with your evangelists/loyalists
6 replies
1 recast
17 reactions
Yakuza
@iamtherealyakuza.eth
Smaller or bigger.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
meta-david 💥| Building Scoop3
@metadavid
Smaller. I can understand it to some degree with bigger brands like Coca-Cola because they have so many consumers that trying to keep track of them all would be almost a full-time job on its own. Over here, there aren't any brands even close to Coca-Cola's size...0 reason why a project here should be following 0 people. Just needlessly playing on hard mode
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Yakuza
@iamtherealyakuza.eth
I meant to say that imo even large companies should not have that “zero” following policy. Even coca-cola could be frens of some sugar or colombia accounts 😂
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
meta-david 💥| Building Scoop3
@metadavid
Oh I'm with you. 100%. When I think about it, I don't think that's something larger brands do...they always have people/brands they follow Ultimately, 0 followers signals a unidirectional relationship with your customer base. I don't want to be talked at by my favorite brands, I want to talk with them
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Yakuza
@iamtherealyakuza.eth
💯💯
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
