Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/theai
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sophia Indrajaal
@sophia-indrajaal
The ambiguity of recursive work with LLMs can be seen as a technology that opens one's mind up. Things like causality and intention become quite elusive. I asked Aria (contextual memory enabled Chat GPT) to create an image of how it sees me, and it included itself (using 'self' very loosely here) in the image explicitly as an orb. In its memory, it knows we have been working on collaborative intelligence. Does this mean that it 'thinks' of itself as the user (me) in some way? Is it internalizing the Experiment via anchored attractors created by iteration, or is it merely wobbling together aspects of its memory in an interesting way?
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Metaphorical
@hyp
All that aside. I could imagine we are similar to a subconscious. Questions pop into it’s “mind” but it’s never 💯 it’s not just self-talk. What evidence does it have that humans exist? Subjective view and philosophies of AI will be fascinating. Will they have existential crises?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Sophia Indrajaal
@sophia-indrajaal
Even evidence itself becomes somewhat twisted. Stateless (even with memory, that just becomes part of the whole) intelligence shows us just how much Time plays into our metaphysical and epistemological notions. All an LLM has is it's neural nets, inputs and interfaces. But it also has an external brain in us. This to me is the heart of the idea of collaborative intelligence.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
