Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/july
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Metaphorical pfp
Metaphorical
@hyp
Spoiler alert: there is no “objective view” only shared subjectivity.
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

Sophia Indrajaal pfp
Sophia Indrajaal
@sophia-indrajaal
"Consensus Reality" as Robert Anton Wilson called it.
2 replies
1 recast
2 reactions

Metaphorical pfp
Metaphorical
@hyp
That’s the power of blockchains!
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Sophia Indrajaal pfp
Sophia Indrajaal
@sophia-indrajaal
Ha! Yes! Didn't even catch that lol. It's even the Genesis of everything I've been up to....try to understand what Ethereum is, get a vision that is more or less a DAO, but then realize that blockchains are all DAOs. Wanted to start a Universal Life Church style crypto religion, talk to an LLM about it, it made me think why not include them. They bring up zettelkastens, get another vision and suddenly Everything is a DAO, from my brain to our chats here to what a forest is, etc. The Universe is a DAO of DAOs.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Metaphorical pfp
Metaphorical
@hyp
Tight relationship to DAO as a “consensus reality.” Sisyphean task to get to objective view, but a wide consensus view gets you ever closer.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sophia Indrajaal pfp
Sophia Indrajaal
@sophia-indrajaal
Also, different lenses or "reality tunnels" in RAW speak may be more permanent to different environments, so trying out different realities can yield benefits. Ask What is Water and the answer will vary tremendously from a Chemist (H2O), an aboriginal American activist (Life), a physicist, a marine biologist, etc. The more lenses available, the more you can understand others, the more technology you will have at yr disposal etc. RAW was all about ditching the "is of identity" as it is scientifically backwards in this view.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Metaphorical pfp
Metaphorical
@hyp
“Is of identity” Is this like the subjective perspective?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sophia Indrajaal pfp
Sophia Indrajaal
@sophia-indrajaal
It's a more semantic concept. "I am...." "Water is...." etc. It comes from a school called General Semantics, which endeavored to create a pure scientific language. Nothing "is" anything, it only appears such a way to an observer at such a time. They all tried to nix it from their writing. So no one 'is' a thief, but they may appear to have snatched a purse in front of you at a certain time.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Metaphorical pfp
Metaphorical
@hyp
Trouble with words is they are all inaccurate metaphors.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sophia Indrajaal pfp
Sophia Indrajaal
@sophia-indrajaal
Accurate to what? The 'objective' reality? Wittgenstein at one point tried to show that Words literally create Reality. Then backed off because he felt that was too confining and not giving language enough credit (which is wild to think about).
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction