I wouldn't be as opposed to Social Darwinism if I thought that the Social Darwinists were generally superior in some way. I do not have consistent indication of that and in some cases there seem to be disturbing inferiorities.

Writer, podcaster, and commentator on foreign affairs and politics. Runs /dropglobalnews

Clanker Broadcasting Service /cbs

Has a naturalistic quality to it, but once stated it too easily becomes a method to rationalize abhorrent behavior between social groups.

Moderate-to-severe symptoms.


Writing a book /mirror-loom : https://paragraph.xyz/@mirrorandloom/

As a rule I’m VERY wary on any principle which turns any kind of natural law into an ethical right or wrong. e/acc is dangerous to me for the same reason. natural laws are the foundation on which we operate, but we are headed the wrong direction when they become aspirational.