Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Matt pfp
Matt
@hughassle.eth
The idea of paying for compute on demand is very alien to most people. A subscription service to pay for gas fees would be more appealing to most people I think.
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
my guess is it's hard to average this out. better to offer subscriptions for certain activities (e.g. minting nfts, sending payments, etc)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ivy pfp
Ivy
@ivy
not really, compute on demand is kind of a key component to serverless
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

!189752 pfp
!189752
@tuvix
Would ERC4337 account abstraction make it possible to implement this, by combining subscriptions with gas sponsoring?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction