Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
It’s day 5 of Farcaster actions. Always looking for feedback to guide what’s next. What are your favorite actions? What’s working well? What’s not? What should we build next?
50 replies
6 recasts
27 reactions

Rodrigo Bardin pfp
Rodrigo Bardin
@rodrigobardin
might have missed other responses on this topic, but would love to know more about this https://warpcast.com/rodrigobardin/0x7f3cf079 i trust the FID example is safe bc trust you (no shade intended here), but things like this (slug) dont inspire much confidence in general
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
Yeah, I agree. Domain associations (connect a Farcaster ID with a domain in a verifiable way) are consistently second or third on the priority stack, but I think they would be useful to establish trust and force apps to use real domains.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
As far as the security model, it's the same as a frame. An action knows who you are and when you click it, and can basically do the same things as a frame.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Rodrigo Bardin pfp
Rodrigo Bardin
@rodrigobardin
yeah i understand - and agree they would be useful. tbh idk if there's a way for actions to be exploited or not, but when i dont have the info (applies to anything in this space), i come from the premise that it can, so any extra point is very useful indeed
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction