Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

ST pfp
ST
@vercelabloh
For anyone that’s investigated this, what’s the technical difficulty with a channel-focused client? Serious question.
5 replies
0 recast
18 reactions

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
IMO very few. You can still only create channels in Warpcast but that shouldn’t stop anyone. Republished from a GC: if you asked me to build this "channel-focused client" I would: 1) Approach it more like an "app" than a "client." Cut out most of the stuff a generic "client" has to do (signups, follows, feeds, search, notifications, chat). If you want to do that, use Warpcast or any of the 10 other clients. 2) Focus narrowly on a really good channel viewing and management experience. Try to do better at surfacing and curating interesting content. Add an integrated curation/moderation tool. (There is a huge underexplored programmability surface here with automated moderation). Add stuff like downvoting, threading, etc. Build on what already exists. 3) Expand to some unique channel focused features: a gated chat, private content, more UI customization, pinned posts, integrations with spaces/blogs/newsletters/subscriptions/events. 4) Monetize by subscriptions, focus on getting 100 power users to start.
7 replies
3 recasts
35 reactions

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
There are now at least ten (!) text based feed focused non-Warpcast clients. Anyone entering that market should have a great differentiator, or play a different game.
1 reply
1 recast
10 reactions

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
p.s. i started hacking on this yesterday atlascasts.com/channels
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Grit, إنشاءالله.eth pfp
Grit, إنشاءالله.eth
@grit
tbh i dont think "channel viewing" is enough, ppl will visit, but not stay. agree with the rest of the points tho, there is a huge demand for more filtered experiences.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
ser could you spare 20 secs to checkout degencast.wtf and dunk on it? It's our attempt to build a channel focused app (less client).. but may still appear too client-ish..
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

scottrepreneur pfp
scottrepreneur
@scottrepreneur.eth
Also following channels is not possible cross-client, so really hampers any advantage of using Farcaster for that generally. Have to rebuild the interest graph each time or focus on one channel/niche.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kbc pfp
kbc
@kbc
@super for creating feeds curated by people + scheduling casts. warpcast for talking with people
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Rodrigo Bardin pfp
Rodrigo Bardin
@rodrigobardin
but from a technical pov, what’s the limitation with channels not being on the protocol? creating and managing only via Warpcast? if warpcast decides to discontinue it for whatever reason, bye bye client/app/whatever? not a dev here but interested to know more
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction