Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/apropos
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pete Horne pfp
Pete Horne
@horneps
There’s this really weird assumption in the “flood the zone” strategy. I think it is correct that you can overwhelm media channels with too much news; so yes you can flood the zone and divert focus from your core actions. But it’s a peak arrogance to assume your actions at scale won’t cause a flood of consequences at scale YOU can’t control. The rational response is look away and wait. There is always a moment of silence after you kick the wasp hive.
3 replies
3 recasts
8 reactions

🗿 pfp
🗿
@bias
Almost like some of these guys never read Ozymandias or something 
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
I feel that much of that “flood the zone” strategy is comprised of shock-and-awe announcements that aren’t followed through, or get negotiated down or reversed a couple of days later without fanfare
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Zero pfp
Zero
@bezero
Unintended consequences but either way, flood the zone is one step ahead of the people/media. And thats all thats needed to do some crazy shit. Maybe it blows up in their face but maybe it doesnt
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction