s3unha on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

s3unha pfp

Here's live-read for a Japanese book translated "Declaration of Localism - From Growth to Steady". https://t.ly/AHNLW H/t @vgr and his pandemic live reads where he live tweeted books as he was reading them. Cast threads UX is nowhere perfect and I'm hoping they become perfect over time.

5 replies

1 recast

15 reactions

s3unha pfp

The author is a Japanese Philosopher, public thinker, educator, cultural critic named Tatsuru Uchida. The book is a collection of 10 essays / 10 ppl / 10 diff industries. Shared topic was population decline.

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

s3unha pfp

When the book was published in 2017, JP was 10 years into discussing and putting forth solutions for population decline. Way ahead of the curve 😱 The preface is his overarching take on pop decline which he views as a civ prob that's not limited only to JP.

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

s3unha pfp

For JP their pop is expected to drop from 127m to 60m, a 50% decrease over 80 years. He doesn't believe pop decline is a problem Govt or anyone can respond at scale once in motion. Pop decline is followed by shrinking mkt and existing biz models having to change or dying.

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

s3unha pfp

At the time of writing, there was no national discussion around what form JP would end up with due to pop decline. I wonder what the influence of Covid is to pop decline and if he thinks any differently.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

s3unha pfp

On top of pop decline, he fears AI taking jobs. JP gets to choose their poison that they're first up to bat. He wasn't sure what industries would lose their job first but predicted manufacturing and services. If I replaced "pop decline" with "climate" the tone would sound more of less the same. Similar BIG prob.

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

s3unha pfp

People predict pop declining society being prevalent around the world. Why aren't we speaking enough about this? Or are we but with diff words describing the same set of phenomena ie Degrowth theory, steady state economy etc? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degrowth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steady-state_economy

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

s3unha pfp

JP is first for hyper low birthrate and hyper-aging but these phenomena are sweeping all across NE Asia. No one knows what'll happen. He rants how he doesn't want to write this book but he must bcoz the professionals dont bother to discuss the issue. This is a red flag that JP society doesnt take pop decline srsly.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

s3unha pfp

Wars, econ depression, natural disasters are "normal" in the sense it can happen to any of us. A national culture that doesnt seek any solution although there's a high probability of an imminent threat is danger at another lvl. Ser you'll be appalled at the crappy responses and drama of the pandemic.

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

s3unha pfp

I read once if govt cant tell ppl to have fewer kids or lower standard of living, though we're at carrying capacity, the easiest thing is to label fossil fuels = bad. https://cryptohayes.medium.com/thirst-trap-4f8b936b809e

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

s3unha pfp

the malthusian view has existed for decades and it labeled pop decline = bad. the 1st essay puts for a view that pop decline is a natural and reasonable because it's the earth self correcting for sustainability.

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

s3unha pfp

all adv countries except US face pop decline. 22nd century, all nations will face low birth and pop decline. it may be inevitable but def not easy to accept. The JP mind is diff from US in that JP doesnt like prepping for worst case scenarios while US values black swan thinking as demonstrated in WWII.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

He exhorts JP readers to not label those who prep for black swan as pessimists and ostracize them.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Though pop decline is a real danger that could wipe out JP natl, local govt are not active reaching nor reaching consensus on counter plans. Cultural dynamics and their influence on decision making is real. And he may be pointing to a blindspot between top-down & bottom-up systems. A /publicgoods problem?

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

s3unha pfp

JP society fears facing pessimism that leads to avoiding facing reality. Only Plan A that turns around pop decline is drawn and not Plan B, C that minimizes damage. The logic is: prepping for the worst is defeatism and defeatism leads to defeat. JP logic is not doing anything > prepping for the worst.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

To the JP psyche, reality is not created by a person but created elsewhere and happens on a person. Passive > Active. Mic drop.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Pop decline is NOT a natural disaster but can be predicted 2 decades in adv since 95% of birth is from women 20-39 yrs old. We're taken aback by news that pop rate has hit an all time low when we could predict the decline 2 decades ago.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

JP predicted rapid pop decline in early 21st cent as early as 1980s. No one wanted to raise this issue during ATH for JP econ. Who ever thought they would lose decades. But it happened. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Decades

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Universities were the worst when it came to burying their head in the sand. Their tgt was clear: 18 year olds and that gave 18 years to prep. In 1993 Tatsuru first heard of pop decline at an Uni offsite. he was shocked because he realized no action was taken since 1975.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Unis cont to increase their admission capacity, staff, budget and salary. They built up a system that would give them hell 18 years later for 18 years. No one could refute "strike when the iron's hot."

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Pre-Covid 2017, 112/660 17% higher ed institutions were in financial trouble and 21 were in danger of being bankruptcy by 2019. It must be way worse post-Covid.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

TIL you can risk hedge all you want w/o correctly accounting for the culture & society as a risk factor. pop decline is not about winning but minimizing dmg.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

3 major factors influence upcoming recession (minus Covid at this point in time): pop decline, AI, [nation-state]-first policies.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

industries he projects will soon suffer mass unemployment: finance, trad media esp natl newspaper & tv.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

interesting—he believes book publishing will be the last industry to resist an inevitable shrinking workforce. it was the earliest to face reality, and it's budget is way smaller than other media. self-publishing is readily available. books are lindy because it's existed prior to capitalism. lindy != job creation

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

all biz models that presuppose a mass market will eventually disappear 🤨 i wonder if this happens at a diff rate for SEA & Africa JP projects biz tgting seniors and poor will thrive. biz tgting poor are biz models that increase in profit as poverty increases. are streaming services this way? 🧐

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

finance is a moneygame that doesnt generate any value. mkts cant exist with only professional fin bros. /degens, WSB and money printer brrr in a few years is going to rock your world 🫥

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

you need mkts, road, comms, common currency, lang, metrology, biz ethics in order for stable econ activities to exist. econ activites are formed on a foundation of trust. put another way, you cant have health economies w/o trust https://warpcast.com/ho/0x583892ab

1 reply

1 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

High vol of $, products & services does not mean a society is mature. He doesn't know he's throwing shade at both modern econ in developed mkts and dysfunctional frontier mkts.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

The chpt ends w/ an opinion that the last system standing will be the most mature system. It feels like a moral appeal. Done with preface and onto the next chapter!

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Chp 1 is written by a biologist, Kiyohiko Ikeda. In 30 yrs, aging population won't be a prob and only low birth and pop decline will remain. It's all about carrying capacity. If we see a pop explosion in nature, it's not carrying capacity that's increased but some factor that repressed pop has disappeared.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Will stop and come back in a few. Thanks for reading.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Picking up from where I left yesterday. The majority of animals are conservative when switching habitats. Mammals are the exception that tend to mass migrate when pop density rises relative to carrying capacity. most that migrate die and few that remain tend to survive.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Unlike chimps and gorillas that stayed put, Homo Sapiens migrated out of Africa. For the Homo genus, stress was another cause for migration. Increased food supply meant an increasing pop and improvements in hunting, gathering tech quickened reaching carrying capacity. The surplus pop would hit the road again. Repeat.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

There were two choices: remain hunter-gathers and hold pop or start farming for increased pop. Societal makeup changed from a small group of skilled hunter-gatherers with static carrying capacity to larger group = more labor = increased carrying capacity through effort. Farming found a virtuous cycle.

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Violence exploded after humans entered an agrarian society as humans became weary of famine and pillaging. A society would exert violence both externally and internally. Internal violence was used to enforce law and order as society now was above the Dunbar #. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sovereign_Individual

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Like today, when humans solved the production prob, the distribution prob followed. Letter, law, and ready violence led to classes—Rousseau's moral inequality. In 3-4 millennia humans came up with taxes, currency, world religion, social class, and dictatorship. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discourse_on_Inequality

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

s3unha pfp

Some of these social devices have taken root ie currency, religion. Others have faded into history ie social class, empires. Because 4 millennia is a speck in the greater history of mankind, it's more rational to assume existing social systems will change than remain the same.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Pop growth gradually increased till early 18th cent in spite of war, famine and pandemic. Mid 18th cent was inflection pt and pop shot straight up. The industrial, energy, scientific revolutions & efficient food production sharply increased humanity's carrying capacity. Laborers increased in cities. Enter capitalism.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

s3unha pfp

Capitalism went from local to global because capitalists seek cheap labor. TIL global capitalism is predicated on arbitrage. Global capitalism needs pop and resources esp energy to cont increasing.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Biologically, all animal pop increase when carrying capacity increases. Society is based on this ecological principle whether world empires or global capitalism, until modern JP. It's the first time where increasing carrying capacity doesn't increase pop.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

When low birthrate expands to a global scale, capitalism, as we know it, will come to an end. Capitalism scales, until it doesn't 😕 It's comforting to know this is the discussion we've been having; OTOH I'm nervous not being sure abt the influence of Covid (money printing and all) on our past trajectory.

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

s3unha pfp

The biologist author takes comfort in the fact that while pop decline may be a disaster for JP, after awhile pop will stabilize as biology returns to it's normal state. Bearish short term, bullish long.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Pop decreased in JP coz females refused to exchange their happiness for raising children. Regardless of economic status, no one fell for this fantasy. He projects females in developed countries will end up on the same path. World pop will peak around 2100 and decrease. It will normalize between 2200 and 2300 around 5b

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Until then there's this icky transition period and the accompanying vicious cycle: Low birth in JP -> shortage of labor -> rising wages -> move factory to country w/ cheaper labor OR hire cheaper oversea laborers in JP -> wages fall in JP.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

If you're from the countryside it's rational to move back & farm to be self-sufficient. Then create a community w/ others like you. As long as you stay within the Dunbar #, autonomy and order are maintained. The collective grows stronger with every exchange.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Mutual cooperation. A throwback to the hunter-gather days except the primary means of production is farming. Sounds like 21st century homesteading for NE Asians. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_the_Good_Life

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

He believes with increasing migrant workers Japan will end up multiethnic, monocultural in 2-3 years. The JP language will play the primary role in upholding monoculture. A pretty diff vision of the future considering that in places like France we are starting see cracks and conflicts around culture.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Whether pop decline or AI removing jobs, the most important question is "who's buying?" and UBI is a solution to maintain demand. Is there an alternative system to UBI for a populous country? Unless govt control human liquidity, everyone would want to go live somewhere w/ UBI.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

For this biologist, the curtain is closing on capitalism as is. Two questions are the most impt: 1. what is the rate at which the curtain closes? 2. what's our attitude towards it? I'm not confident future generations will accept an econ that ebbs and flows as it inversely moves with its population.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Chp 2 we've got Tomohiro Inoue a macroeconomist. Starts w/ common macro economic numbers: - JP: 0.9% avg real growth rate for 2 decades - US & many developed countries: hovered around 2% avg real growth rate for 2 decades

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Developing countries tend to rapidly expand production facilities aka capital for growth rate. It's hard for a developed nation to maintain a high growth rate but with tech innovations, they can maintain a gradual econ growth as long as ppl research, invent, and discover. tech progress and econ growth don't stop.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Abenomics aimed for 2% "natural" growth as JP econ had a growth rate below that for decades. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abenomics

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

If JP cont to decline the biggest responsibility lies with a failed fiscal & fin policy. However, this isn't just a supply side prob as JP orgs are highly inefficient when it comes to production. The world is moving towards intellectual capitalism where intellectual power, not a nation's (labor) headcount, matters.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

And JP's intellectual power is in danger. The decline of intellectual power & lack of science/tech will have a bigger negative influence on JP than low birth rate or an aging pop. Exciting! But I'll stop live-casting until next time.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Let's jump right in. General purpose techs (GPTs 🤨) and their apps ushered in tech revolutions. The ongoing digital revolution differs from previous revolutions in that it doesn't bring abundance to all laborers but leads to the great decoupling. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decoupling_of_wages_from_productivity

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

The move from hunter-gatherer to an agrarian society swung from specialized to general. The move from 2nd to 3rd industrial revolution swung from general to specialized. Where are we now? 3rd revolution introduced zero marginal cost as software ate the world. https://a16z.com/why-software-is-eating-the-world/

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Discussions on AGI timelines, states who control AGI controls the future, changes AGI will bring to prod structures, etc follows 🥱 It feels like speculation from 20 years ago but it's only been 7 years. ChatGPT was released a bit over a year ago, and it's had a lasting impact on changing all our expectations 🤯

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Tech revolutions helped humans to escape the Malthusian trap. Output > pop growth. But the prosperity and benefit of tech revolutions weren't distributed evenly across the globe and led to the Great Divergence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malthusianism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Divergence

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

The 2nd and 3rd ind revolutions brought big changes but it didn't change fundamental structures. Humans still live in a mechanized econ that when analyzed by a solow model, growth comes out to 2% over the long run. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solow%E2%80%93Swan_model

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

The author believes it's possible to exceed the periods of high economic growth from the past w/ machine economies. H/t e/acc 👀 Apply AK model to machine economies, and you'll see growth rate increase each year instead of sustained x% growth over time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK_model

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

JP benefited from the first Great Divergence and enjoyed a prosperous 20th century, BUT lost the digital revolution—most digital services in JP are provided by MANGA.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

The author expresses a lot of FUD abt JP's future. - JP's renowned customer xp can be replaced by robots Made Outside JP. - JP may not be able to defend itself against E Asian military threats. - The threat JP will be left behind w/ AI is too real.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

In 2017, JP govt didn't take measures. But post-Covid they're attempting to tackle these issues: - Setup Digital Agency and appointed a Minister for Digital Transformation - Moving towards less regulation for AI, crypto, etc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Agency

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

But, it's not all roses. https://www.nbr.org/publication/overcoming-japans-uphill-battle-toward-digital-transformation/

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Two reasons are put forth as to why JP lacks intellectual power: 1. JP co's and uni's can't attract global talent and can't retain local talent. 2. JP work culture has excessive amounts of meaningless work ie paper-pushing, socializing after work hrs, long work hrs uncorrelated to high output, compliance etc

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Conclusion: when it comes to productivity, meaningless work can produce effects equal or greater than pop decline. Off to the next chapter!

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Next we have Kosuke Motani, a regional economist. He wants to challenge common and deep misconceptions JP hold about pop decline.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

There are several v interesting charts in this chp but I won't be sharing them as words will appear as jibberish. 😥

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

"Locales are underdeveloped compared to cities." Regional inequality is predicated on population increase. Census data from 2010-2015 shows, the only region w/ smooth pop increase is Tokyo Metropolis & 7 regions have tiny increases. Inequality isn't expanding between locales v cities. It's Tokyo Met v everywhere else

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

There's a catch. The elderly make up most of the rapid pop expansion in Tokyo. Ppl tend to mistakenly correlate pop increase w/ working pop or taxpayers. Out of the 360k pop increase in Tokyo Met between 5 yrs, 2/3 is above 75y, remaining 1/3 is 65y-74y, and 30k pop decreased <64y.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Tokyo centralization is accelerating Out of the 2.13m >75y pop increase in JP, 1/3 increased in Tokyo Met. Add the 3 large city areas of Osaka, Kyoto, Hyogo, Shiga, Nara, Aichi then 1.3m or 61% pop increase of >75y happens in cities.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

>75y pop increase of the 3 oldest prefectures (Akita, Shimane, Kochi) is 20k and less than 1% of all JP. Shimane, for ex, has more >75y dying than increasing. The minute increase is from city-dwellers who are returning home or enrolling in long term care facilities.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Since many Shimane youth left to cities during the high growth period, there's no aging pop now. The absolute elderly pop will shrink. It doesn't mean the % of elderly will drop in Shimane but the burden of medical welfare will decline YoY. For Tokyo Met, their absolute elderly pop shrinks in a few decades.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

That's all for today!

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

I'm back. Let's jump right in. These facts run opposite to the belief that "aging is worse in underdeveloped regions."

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

An aging rate metric that includes >= 65y is inaccurate because the demand for elderly medical welfare is correlated to the absolute pop of >=75y. If pop >=75y decreases then the medical welfare burden decreases no matter how high the rate. If pop >=75y increases then the burden increases regardless how low the rate.

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

TL;DR 1. Pop inequality is expanding between Tokyo Met vs everywhere & it's the elderly that make up most of the pop increase. 2. The medical welfare burden on admin districts & local govt is correlated to pop >=75y.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

There's a belief in JP that increase in youth pop = increase in wrking pop. **No matter how many youth move to Tokyo, wrking pop doesn't grow.** From 2010-2015, the wrking pop 15-64y in Tokyo Met dropped 80k.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

During that time, children from 0-14y increased 50k. It's not that Tokyo's birthrate went up. Instead, young families w/ children from adjacent areas moved to Tokyo. Other than Tokyo, only Okinawa had an increase of 2k children. Their birthrate was close to 2 where this increase was actually due to birth.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Both Tokyo and Okinawa children's pop increased but their causes were different. The notion "Tokyo benefits as much as the provinces are struggling" is inaccurate. Sounds like a sinking ship 🫣

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

JP's children pop has dropped <40% in 50y, and this affects pop decline in all of JP. For Tokyo, their birthrate is lower than the national avg, and youth that moved to JP bore relatively less children than those in provinces. Youth pop movement doesn't determine success/failure of a region.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

The only way for Tokyo to overturn this 50y long low birthrate is to drain pop from other provinces. 😯 For provinces, youth moving to cities does not cause pop decline. Low birthrate is the culprit in every region except Okinawa. Even if no youth leaves their hometown, wrking pop will still decline. 😧

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Tokyo & cities are a blackhole. The more youth move to cities, the number of children for the next gen declines, and JP pop decline accelerates. https://www.amazon.co.jp/-/en/%E5%A2%97%E7%94%B0-%E5%AF%9B%E4%B9%9F/dp/4121022823 https://www.amazon.co.jp/-/en/%E5%A2%97%E7%94%B0-%E5%AF%9B%E4%B9%9F/dp/4121023552

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

"It's easy to assume JP is doomed. It's the wrong response for two reasons."

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

1. Pop decline has begun everywhere, it's not yet evenly distributed. CN, KR, TW is well underway. (1) Pop between 10-14y is growing equal to (2) pop between 60-64y & low birthrate is creeping up in US, EU, SEA. The only (1)>(2) regions are India, Middle Near East, Africa.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

These things will happen post-2020: - JP's elderly absolute pop increase stops—rise in the capital but fall everywhere else. - Elderly pop increases in EU, US. Rapid increase for CN, KR, TW. - CN, KR, TW wrking pop will peak around 2015 like how wrking pop peaked in 95 for JP. Increase slows down in West.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

There's a belief immigration increases childbirth when the reality is absolute pop of children is diminishing in US and SG—countries accepting large # of immigrants. Immigrants who move to areas w/ low birth because of high cost of raising children bear less children like the locals—similar to how it is in Tokyo.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

There's a tendency to believe immigrants bears lots of children regardless of circumstance. That's not happening. What's happening is the world is self-correcting to improve the sustainability of human society through low birthrate.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Post-Covid pop decline is underway like what the author predicted. Although the temp seems diff for diff regions. NE Asia does take pop decline seriously. SEA doesn't seem to care at all. US can always tighten or loosen immigration policies & demand far exceeds supply.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

EU is interesting. There were large inflow of refugees & lately run-ins between immigrant vs locals. My hunch is some immigrants decelerates pop decline. The author didn't address cultural/religious backgrounds of immigrants & how that may affect birthrate. He assumes all will be localized/secularized.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Once immigrants of a particular culture hit critical mass in their host country, the local social norm is bound to change. Social norms are dynamic, not static. https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/wayne/2023/11/08/hamtramck-city-council-to-remain-all-muslim-as-lgbtq-candidate-fails/71494617007/

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Still I'm impressed at how the author's projections were quite accurate. Covid, if anything, decreased the elder pop, but didn't affect the rate of change.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

2. In those underdeveloped areas where the elder pop has peaked, low birthrates have turned around for an increasing # of local govts. The author proposes a new birthrate metric. The # of 25-39y in a region to # of 0-4y helps measure a region's next-gen regen rate. Are there 100 children for every 300 30-somethings?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

You divide the # of 30-somethings, by 3, and compare 100:100. If the ratio is 1:1, it's healthy. The lower the # of children, less childbirth. Youth <=24 isn't included because most temporarily live in cities due to school. The ratio for cities would be inaccurate if they were included.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

I'll stop here, and come back later today.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Pop doesn't declines because F don't bear children. It's more accurate that pop declines because M don't marry & do not coop in raising children. Looking at the next-gen regen rate, scattered regions across JP bear as many # children as the # of parents.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

According to 2015 data, JP avg rate is 68%. The pop of every gen of kids is 2/3 parents. There are ~1m births every yr. If continued for 30y when you lose 30% of the # of parents, there will be <700k births every yr. A rough calculation shows at avg lifespan of 80y, 700k*80 = JP total pop will be 56m.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Early 70s there were 2m children born every yr. Right now it's half. In 30y it will be 1/3. When mapped out Okinawa leads w/ 93% and west JP has higher rate than east JP. Out of major cities other than Hiroshima and Kitakyushu, all other cities are stuck around 60%. Tokyo Met is the lowest at 52%.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Just coz Tokyo flops doesn't mean JP will flop. Around Okinawa Prefecture there are 40 local govt >100% next-gen regen rate. Accounting for >90% there are 110 local govt. Most of these are on remote islands or mountainous underdeveloped regions that challenges the notion these regions don't have children.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

While there are regions like that, there are other regions that hold the young gen raising children & children dear. It's not that JP's DNA changed. Lifestyle and environments changed. DNA will kick in once the environment is diff.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Looking at the diff between E and W, E regions surrounding Akita that hold strong trad values of "women should marry" have lower birthrate than Okinawa on the W that pressures women less has higher birthrate. Social pressure has a negative effect on birth. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akita_Prefecture

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Solution? Create a societal structure where those who want children can bear as many children as they desire. As long as there are parents who raise kids, whether theirs or not, next-gen regen rate goes up. JP needs systems that lessen the burden of raising many kids.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

In W local govts, they still have a social ethos to fully support families w/ many kids. It's reasonable to assume this trad died out in E JP & cities. Send youth who want kids to regions where they can have as many kids as they want, there's cheap cost of living & a supportive social ethos.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

The skeptic in me wonders how to influence the central govt to reallocate budgets to a shrinking voter populace before it's too late. Will there be a power shift from central to local govts as these changes are only taking place at a local lvl? Next chapter!

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Next author we have Katsumi Hirakawa. Founder of a couple hip cafes & radiodays.jp an audio download site for voice and narrations + Writer. https://twitter.com/hirakawamaru

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

There are 2 reactions to pop decline in JP: ignoring reality or alarmism. Ppl aren't able to face it as a real historical problem. The biggest reason is JP tendency to calculate everything in terms of pros/cons. While calc is helpful for urgent probs, it doesn't help for historical probs. Pop is no exception.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Human gut instinct is to put our heads in the sand or overreact when facing probs. I see a repeating human pattern whether in pop decline, AI (luddites, doomers), climate change (it's a hoax, alarmist).

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

The author doesn't view pop decline as prob that can be solved through econ means. It's a social change that inevitably happens in the dev of capitalism.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Econ, pop decrease, aging are connected problems. While pop decline massively affects econ, econ barely affects pop prob. Econ is a calculable short term prob; pop decline is a long term change in social structure that happens in the dev of civilization.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

You can solve the pop prob to get out of deflation. The orders are wrong. Instead change social structure in line with pop decline. TIL JP political conversations around pop decline started in 2008 🙊

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

I'm halfway through the book. Will return soon.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Let's continue where I left off.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

pop decline is not a prob but a consequence of econ dev and modernization Late 2000s JP politicians pointed fingers at females for not bearing children becoz it seemed like the most direct cause of pop decline. this is a lie in the sense that all F have stopped bearing children.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

1980-2010, birthrate for F w/ spouse didnt drop but is rising. F birthrate between 30-39y, during the same time, holds steady. OTOH, the birthrate decline can be seen in F between 20-24y, 25-30y

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

since the suitable age for bearing children is 23-30y, a primary factor for pop decline is late marriage—the age for ppl's 1st marriage rose from 23y in 1950 to 29.4y in 2015 this should be the starting pt to discuss low birthrate

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

im noticing the book emphasizes many times how surface lvl understanding of data leads to misinterpretation. politicians, in particular, seem to select the simplest and most memeable data to make their political point. it's teaching me not to take anything at face value but always dig deeper. 😮‍💨

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

some econ indicators move either up or down & some are volatile. you have stock prices, CPI, employment rate for the fomer; you have life expectancy, # of ppl per gen, marriage age, # of convenient stores, # of cars, tv penetration rate for the latter.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

the former indicators are affected by unpredictable supply-demand and psych factors. while the latter indicators point to JP's modernization and marketizations following the pacific war—science and markets cont to make progress.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

"birthrate declined because ppl marry later" is simple cause & effect. the causes for why ppl marry later is much more complicated. if marrying later is due to econ reasons, policies that financially support those who are in their childbearing age could be helpful. tho that's not sufficient to turn the tide.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

the author hypothesizes there's a close correlation between marrying later, changing family structures (from authoritarian large fam to nuclear fam) & the progress of marketization w/ progress of marketization being the factor that changed family structures.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

marketization and the nuclear fam challenged the trad JP perspective that you marry to create a fam. family as safety net was replaced by money as safety net & mkts set individuals free from under authority. freedom & progress enabled marrying late.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

econ activities, at a small scale, are formed on a foundation of trust—ethics shared by communities. mkts are introduced & allows everything to become fungible. fungibility implies indifference. shared ethics play a smaller role. mkts minimize trust w/o having to build connections https://warpcast.com/ho/0xcb6d78d6

1 reply

1 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

ppl arent marrying later bcoz they're avoiding marriage; they're running away from communities including fam & that breaks up JP's authoritarian lineal fam. consumer society put in place an ethic of calculating the pros/cons of marriage. being a housewife, havings kids to feed & paying for tuition doesnt make sense

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

it's impossible to go back to an authoritarian lineal fam. what is possible is to change the calculating ethic that keeps someone from choosing to be a housewife.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

if it's impossible to pivot from marrying late to early, the only policy for low birthrate is to create an environment where someone can bear children w/o marriage. change age long ethics for utility! ✊ is it only me or does that sound like a heavy lift? 🤔

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

JP & KR, countries that cant cntrl birthrate, to EU, somewhat cntrls birthrate, & # birth outside wedlock stands out. FR, SE are >50%, DE is at 35%. JP's # birth outside wedlock differs by an order of magntude at 2.3%. KR 1.9%. the confucian ethics in E Asia forbids birth outside marriage.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

JP's govt measures for birthrate center around promoting marriage and childcare support. EU grants all children the rights to receive protection under law & social capital. Political authorities are not to meddle in personal affairs & instead focus on expanding human & living rights.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

EU isnt promoting birth out of wedlock. They're legally recognizing the rights of families who are not protected under marriage law & creating a space for them in society Families are not centered around marriages, but the child. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_solidarity_pact

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

The marriage age hasnt miraculously declined in FR & SE to stop pop decline. F marry >30y & marriage age shows no sign of declining 👀 I wonder—is marriage age the wrong thing to measure?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Once children out of wedlock is >50%, correlation between birth & marriage weakens. But if there are no children out of wedlock, birth & marriage will always maintain strong correlation. Fam structure has changed, and it's time for ethics to follow.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

JP has gone through a massive shift in ethics after the pacific war. The bubble economy changed ppl's conception of money as a enabler to set them free from the past & social hierarchy. A person was as valuable as their possession. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_asset_price_bubble

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

"Someone holds trad values" doesn't say anything about them. It's much more informative to emphasize what point in time their values were en vogue.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

The ethics of the world before monetary econ differed from that of exchange value. Archaic societies prior to civ were based on gift economies. Modern man uses both the ethics of exchange value & the ethics of gifting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchange_value https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gift_economy

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Pieces of past ethics still remain in JP society & they may be the hope for the future. You can most clearly see gifting in parental relationships or friendships. The driving force behind capitalism is constant creation and settlement of relationships through tx. Increase tx, econ grows.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

OTOH communal operating procedures are based around rules & not cost-benefit. Those who didn't follow rules were banished & the only place they could live in were mkts. The prob of modern society is that mkt values has encroached on communal space. Modernity breaks ancient rules & creates a rational society.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Marketization almost means the same as indifference. Mkts cannot be formed within communities. What's left in a society of declining pop is to design a communal place in an indifferent world.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Once we regenerate social capital that's been destroyed through privatization, establish symbiotic palces within cities to replace families & return to mutual assistance, pop decline will cease to be a prob.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Having read all that, the word trustlessness seems to stirs up two visions for ppl in crypto: 1. A transactional, market-based vision. Zero trust required. 2. A relational, communal vision that's tired of zero trust. The book as a whole, so far, is trying to deliver the second message.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

We back! Mikako Brady—child care worker, author, columnist living in the UK—wrote chpt 5. She examines EU case studies for lsns JP could implement. Chp 5 I found uninteresting as she critiques austerity measures & guides the reader to liberal fiscal policies. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_monetary_theory

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Post-Covid, we've witnessed multi-year high inflation that didn't move the needle in improving employment lvls. I'll mention the few things I found interesting. TLDR. The reality of living in a shrinking state is neither fun nor something to not fear but brutal.

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Severe austerity measures in EU after 2008 led to pop decline. From 2010, UK avg age didnt rise. UK has beentransformed into a shrinking state. UK's NHS dilapidated. Fiscal policies that tried to decrease deficit actually has the reverse effect of increasing debt.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Everything in JP is relatively cheap compared to the rest of the world due to deflation. JP has great service & care but it isn't priced accurately. A deflationary country is no country for the young and the Have-Nots but great for the Haves.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

JP well may become a country where the young go overseas to earn wages & once they can't work, return to live frugally. Society isn't made up of ppl who want to live Anywhere. Most ppl are Somewheres. A place where those who don't wanna live outside can't get their hands on what they want or can't grow has no future.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Immigration since 2017 has shown not all immigrants are the same. All immigrants bring baggage—their cultures, religions, exp & trad. Immigrants aren't & refuse to be treated as simple econ solutions. There's a hefty social cost to pay, sooner or later. https://warpcast.com/ho/0xc025f1e3

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Immigration can solve birthrate in the short run, but in a longer run a society integrates, evolves into a multicultural society, or suffers internal strife. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/how-a-migration-crisis-is-fueling-germany-s-far-right-surge/3029913

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

The last thing that stood out to me this chp was that most ppl aim to settle down & live Somewhere. Those who aim or are ok living Anywhere are exceptions to the rule. While the disposition to live anywhere is distributed at random, the ability to select where you want to live is a privilege reserved for a few.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

s3unha pfp

Opportunities for digital nomadism, remote work, /network-states are nowhere near being distributed evenly. Onwards we go!

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction