Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
I use likes as a way to “ack” replies, but have been stingy lately because my allo is running out Other options: - stop acking: sucks because I read all the replies - reply back: sometimes I have nothing to say - buy more storage: annoying bc my casts and follows are underutilized relative to reactions What do?
10 replies
1 recast
14 reactions

Blockchain Bandido pfp
Blockchain Bandido
@indicub.eth
Hmm makes me wonder @dwr.eth maybe casts / follows should make up for less % of storage when purchasing? I have the same issue
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
On average, casts are more valuable to the network. If you want to preserve all your likes, buy more storage. If you don't care, then it will just remove your oldest ones.
4 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

hillis pfp
hillis
@hillis
While this makes sense if you fully understand the system, my initial reaction was that I should preserve my likes since I had a limited budget. While casts are more valuable from a content perspective, likes are more valuable from an engagement perspective. If people are stingy with likes, it causes me to cast less.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

hillis pfp
hillis
@hillis
Also, likes are binary, so lower cost to store. Knowing that it’s a rolling window of saved likes and not a limit is key—I think clarifying this in the UX would make people like more I have a script that saves my liked tweets into my note system. I bet people will implement similar external storage methods here
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction