design critiques

Design

Without knowing the context of this screen, it’s hard to give fully accurate feedback but:

> sequential process but you can go back any # of steps to refresh or adjust

> lack of visual hierarchy

> inconsistent typography (weight, colour, and letter spacing)

> inconsistent distribution of steps (spacing)

/1

random facts and life excerpts. vulnerability is strength ✨🌈 fullstack & design, building /uno

> icon colours don’t signify status of step (“unsafe” price impact is green)

> now i’m second guessing if this is supposed to be a sequential process  or just a swap settings screen?

> ellipses make it seem like something is still in progress

Thanks @heavygweit, I agree that the original post is taken off the context.

Appreciate if you could share your thoughts on the actual screen at https://aerodrome.finance/swap

❤️

Seeing it in context, my feedback would still apply! It does have potential to create confusion or misunderstandings 

Most important feedback to consider is: highlighting warning states & visual hierarchy of values vs labels

Also reconsider the layout, that info isn’t a sequential process but it looks like one

The central trading and liquidity marketplace on BASE

https://aerodrome.finance