Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
oliver
@oliverk120.eth
Question about smart wallets wrt. L2's. If ENS (or anyone else) had its own L2 and you had a smart wallet - could your interactions with the ENS L2 feel like your were interacting with L1? e.g. bridge to l2, buy ENS, configure, bridge remaining funds if any back all in one batched transaction that you sign for once?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Harry Noble
@harry
Always getting easier, but as of today: - L1 fees for smart wallets are high, best to stay on L2s if possible. - Batched txns execute on a single chain. You can end a batch with a bridge, but in order to continue on the second chain, you'll need a separately signed and submitted operation.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
oliver
@oliverk120.eth
AHH ok thank you - that's very helpful. So realistically it just improves your UX on a single chain rather than abstracting away all the crypto backend entirely
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harry Noble
@harry
Yeah, that’s where we’re at now, but cross chain overhead is high on our list of ux issues to solve. One step at a time
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
oliver
@oliverk120.eth
💪
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
