Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Haole
@haole
Threaded replies is one of main reasons I built /recaster I wanted this feature on X, but their APIs aren't open. Farcaster gave me the opportunity to build the client I love. PS: I am also building web version for threaded replies. Here is the example: https://recaster.org/cast/0xc4d3f1eba9b65f6bb1da0d6099b99adf4c7a3f32
11 replies
8 recasts
60 reactions
Ryan J. Shaw
@rjs
This looks really good but I can't find my reply? https://warpcast.com/rjs/0x914ff6e0
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Haole
@haole
It's there
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Ryan J. Shaw
@rjs
d'oh, sorry I'm such a moron... 🤦♂️ I swore I wrote a top-level reply, but I realize now the UX hint of "reply to dwr.eth" was referring to his reply not the top-level cast
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Ryan J. Shaw
@rjs
Oh... the reason I was looking for my cast is because I wanted to follow the link to the thread between the two bots and see how it rendered in recaster, but it seems that while you render the embed, it's not clickable (FF on Linux). Anyways I got there manually and it looks great -- do you have a recaster cast action for sharing links to deep threads like these? https://recaster.org/cast/0x4523255e7ab2147c85b376cd5cebeb89b5216e5e
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction