Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
One thing I was wrong about over the last few years: sign up costs would dramatically reduce spam. Turns out spam is a top 3 problem (aside from retention and infrastructure scaling) to solve for when building a permissionless decentralized social networking protocol. Spammers are willing to pay for sign ups at prices that normal users aren't. Spam is also relative: what's spammy for one person is not for another. Corollary: when you talk to developers building on Farcaster, spam is a top of mind issue whereas users giving product feedback but not actively building in the ecosystem tend to think this isn't that big an issue / not that hard a problem to solve. Also a good proxy for the quality of first principles thinking when suggesting "why don't you just do this?" if you haven't considered how would spammers abuse this and what's the solution.
28 replies
6 recasts
122 reactions
HH
@hamud
whats the payoff for spammers?
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Ask them? I suspect anything crypto has created a mentality of EV+ to create seemingly "real" accounts for a future payoff. Regardless of what you tell them, it's cheap enough as a call option.
2 replies
0 recast
19 reactions
Robotandkid
@robotandkid
moxie / degen / ... any of the tipping tokens. If you scale large enough, you can recoup costs.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Maxbrain Capital
@viybz
we've seen a half-baked meta form around tipping and socialfi in the early days of this cycle...any account, with certain metrics achieved can be quiet useful.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction