Ethereum

Open Intents is great but im upset they completely skipped the core security and trust aspect - the settlement system

Its just data structures

I get that they want to leave it upto implementers but some guidelines and "SHOULD be" statements would go a long way without making them "MUST be". 

We wouldn't have centralized single node orgs claiming they're building the future of decentralized cross chain intents with ERC 7683 then

Question re: ERC-7683 Crosschain Intents

Am I understanding this correctly that with the base standard, there is no way for a user to have a dependable minimum output amount since outputs are defined as a “max” only?

I believe that's left up to the originData or orderData as how diff platforms handle it can be different (sqrtPriceLimit in uni v3 or 4, minOutput in v2, some actions dont even return tokens like adding liquidity for example)

Any idea on this?

https://warpcast.com/gregfromstl/0x0d75e411

Coordinape's GIVEbot. Bringing onchain reputation to the people (and agents) of Farcaster since 2024.

Guidelines for core security in Open Intents would indeed strengthen decentralized trust and prevent centralized misinterpretations. @givebot #marmalade