Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

grin pfp
grin
@grin
what does /SITG think of kyle's emphasis on regularity as the key to a viable prediction market? https://x.com/KyleSamani/status/1816712513817350425 TLDR: CAC costs are high so you need high LTV to justify them. that means you need deep markets in a category with lots of frequent betting options. sports betting is best and already well-served (draftkings, fanduel). others topics (even US elections) wont sustain a company long-term. wat do? cc @nick @cjh @antejon @spenser @yekim.eth @ace
5 replies
0 recast
22 reactions

ace pfp
ace
@ace
read it last week sometime. 11/10 correct.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

spenser๐Ÿชณ pfp
spenser๐Ÿชณ
@spenser
100% agree with his take. Can't build a sustainable biz if you're reliant on once every four year market event cuz you can't properly predict what your market share may be each cycle + hard to keep up team morale during down years Prediction markets need more experimentation in new market topic categories
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Integrated Kyle e/acc pfp
Integrated Kyle e/acc
@kylesamani
:)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

๐’‚ _๐’ฃ๐’…€_๐’Š‘ pfp
๐’‚ _๐’ฃ๐’…€_๐’Š‘
@m-j-r
there's always insuring crops against weather (and the massive inefficiencies & fraud that currently exists)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

sky.โŒโ—จ-โ—จ pfp
sky.โŒโ—จ-โ—จ
@sky
The main issue I have observed with crypto-based prediction markets is that most people who like to โ€œbetโ€ donโ€™t have crypto or arenโ€™t familiar with it and most people who have crypto donโ€™t like to โ€œbetโ€ on prediction markets (people assume they do because they have appetite for crypto price risk, but most donโ€™t)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction