Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Steen!!! pfp
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
The amount of FC related groups popping up on telegram is wild. Honestly kind of funny that it's taken so long. TG hasn't changed in ways relevant to these groups. WC has changed/improved a lot. The home feed focused experience is unsatisfactory. It's noisy, nudges disingenuous activity, and totally ignores community. Channels actually could compete with telegram, particularly for large communities. The problem is channel UX and notifications. TG is high signal and I can tinker notis where necessary. Everything in there is still of value. As it stands, no shot I'm turning on WC's notis. That would be a lot of effort, and as @zinger noted yesterday, the noti format is yikes. Make channels mini-apps for communities -prioritize channel UX/UI -subchannels/linked channels -first party mod -lots of other things Nft gated GC's are not going to compete with tg lol
16 replies
7 recasts
24 reactions

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
It's kind of funny, re your high signal point I feel exactly the opposite. Telegram is low signal for me, most stuff there is spam or large group chats that I mute and don't check. I also mute gc's on warpcast, but if I get a noti here I know it's important. That said I completely agree re channel experience being subpar. Can't remember if it was @zinger or @kia.eth that said they're warpcast "hashtags you pay $25 for". even if I wanted to create channels around events for example, I couldn't, and there would be no reason to.
4 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Gramajo👽 pfp
Gramajo👽
@gramajo.eth
I feel like I’ve gotten lucky in the I’ve joined the right telegrams chat for good convos. I don’t have the issues of noisy chats bc I can just unsubscribe/leave. I’ve been messing around with it more and really enjoy it’s super quick to spin up a bot to do something for me in a TG chat. Monitoring, sales etc. I see a world where both can live side by side well
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction