Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

Struggling to make sense of the vote outcome for 'fork at 10% threshold' prop.

Shortcutting to my conclusion here but it seems that logically one person (or a consortium) holds an awful lot of nouns, ballpark of 300. And that person is not (primarily) motivated to arb.

Other possibilities?

Perhaps incentives from potential tax offsets via DUNA are larger than those from exit, and this allows them to keep the Nouns.

Whoever is holding these Nouns has certainly lost a lot of $.

somewhat likely conclusion that:
- the person cares more about nouns than the money
- its peanuts anyway (eth wealthy)

- care about Nouns
- support DUNA

choose 1

retired noun | crypto native build0000r | x.com/three_9s

this is not an interesting or useful way to look at anything really, imo.