Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sam (crazy candle person) ✦
@samantha
I’ve been reading “The age of surveillance capitalism” and the author posits that once social networks start censoring users, they become responsible for the moderation of the platform Today tech CEOs testified at Congress and it seems that majority of the senators want *higher* moderation on these platforms
3 replies
2 recasts
33 reactions
Sam (crazy candle person) ✦
@samantha
My q to the philosophy channel is how do you build an uncensored social platform at scale when there is harm such as CP, sextortion, scams, bots etc. In this context harm is subjective. I don’t mean harm = illegal. CP is illegal, sending 1000 $DEGEN and getting 10k back is a scam but not illegal. They are both bad.
12 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Gökhan Turhan 🧬💾🚀
@gokhan.eth
currently, my, or our in the future, only solution for spam posts is a simple guideline to cut off the noise. i myself keep getting bullyish DCs from people i kindly try to showcase how to make the best of the channel without patronizing. reading this in the channel specifics but i get the general gist, & been thinking
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gökhan Turhan 🧬💾🚀
@gokhan.eth
a lot about it given the incoming users, and i was wondering which challenges i'll face hosting/ guiding this channel, and try to make it a meaningful exchange venue, and at the same time keep it safe for everyone without being censorish. thanks for this Q.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
