I’ve been reading “The age of surveillance capitalism” and the author posits that once social networks start censoring users, they become responsible for the moderation of the platform 

Today tech CEOs testified at Congress and it seems that majority of the senators want *higher* moderation on these platforms

they/them, candlemaker at 🕯️humankind 🕯️, seemore.tv/humankind, hosting /samantha, /humankind

@christin @tldr would love to get your thoughts on this if you are open to it. I know it’s a heavy topic but I am so curious, if you have the capacity.

My q to the philosophy channel is how do you build an uncensored social platform at scale when there is harm such as CP, sextortion, scams, bots etc. 

In this context harm is subjective. I don’t mean harm = illegal. CP is illegal, sending 1000 $DEGEN and getting 10k back is a scam but not illegal. They are both bad.

Did you watch any of the testimony? I couldn’t believe my eyes. Among many eye popping moments, they got Mark Zuckerberg into a struggle session with parents of children who died as consequence of activities on social media. I did not come away with any more clarity on my position than when i started 🙈

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com 

It was horrible! It was the same shit as last year but worse. I felt bad for Shou Zi, who got grilled on a country he’s not even apart of 💀

Can’t believe they forced that apology out of Zucc too