Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
why don’t people form small groups (3-5) around an interest, create a channel, and cast/reply to each other? it could: 1. amplify reach (shared audiences) 2. create richer, more dynamic discussions (shared effort) 3. build deeper connections maybe it feels like extra work or it’s hard to find each other?
31 replies
29 recasts
174 reactions

Kieran Daniels 🎩 pfp
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
Because none of my friends are going to pay $5 to use Twitter but with only 1000 people. The issue is onboarding. People just say nah. This is the real issue. There is no incentive to get normal people on here. Until they subsidize growth and attack churn like a SaaS would then it’s just gonna be the same 1000 people casting at each other everyday like it is now.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
not about new people, existing people! need to tackle that first. what’s blocking the behavior of current users who used to do that?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Gökhan Turhan pfp
Gökhan Turhan
@gokhan.eth
it's somewhat due to people have the impression that it's almost token-curated registries in essence and the token part has been tried a lot here. allocating temporal resources to certain X and TG circles have more reach is all. if onboarding here was rather harder and people felt it was a 'club'; that might have done the trick.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction