Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

𝚐π”ͺ𝟾𝚑𝚑𝟾 pfp
𝚐π”ͺ𝟾𝚑𝚑𝟾
@gm8xx8
want to understand how llms work? ☺︎ ↓ llms, explained with a minimum of math and jargon https://www.understandingai.org/p/large-language-models-explained-with
2 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

LIL INTERNET pfp
LIL INTERNET
@lil
Two Q's if you don't mind... 1: Are "word vectors" & "embeddings" the same? Any reason to use the former vs the latter? 2: I read somewhere that word vectors remain largely the same across languages. Does this make word vectors a "universal language?" This would have wild religious / philosophical implications. πŸ™
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

𝚐π”ͺ𝟾𝚑𝚑𝟾 pfp
𝚐π”ͺ𝟾𝚑𝚑𝟾
@gm8xx8
1. yes, β€œword vectors” and β€œembeddings” generally refer to the same concept, w/ β€œembeddings” being a broader term that can also apply to other types of data beyond words.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

𝚐π”ͺ𝟾𝚑𝚑𝟾 pfp
𝚐π”ͺ𝟾𝚑𝚑𝟾
@gm8xx8
2. cross-lingual embeddings link languages but can’t fully bridge linguistic & cultural gaps since they represent concepts / relationships mathematically rather than fully capturing the depth & nuance of human languages.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

LIL INTERNET pfp
LIL INTERNET
@lil
Thank you! Re: language, in my head it was something like the β€œshape” of the relations between all word vectors (imagined as some kind of multidimensional mesh) ends up being very similar. But maybe it’s just because at that scale the β€œshape” is just a model of the human experience of reality.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction