Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

๐š๐”ช๐Ÿพ๐šก๐šก๐Ÿพ pfp
๐š๐”ช๐Ÿพ๐šก๐šก๐Ÿพ
@gm8xx8
want to understand how llms work? โ˜บ๏ธŽ โ†“ llms, explained with a minimum of math and jargon https://www.understandingai.org/p/large-language-models-explained-with
2 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

LIL INTERNET pfp
LIL INTERNET
@lil
Two Q's if you don't mind... 1: Are "word vectors" & "embeddings" the same? Any reason to use the former vs the latter? 2: I read somewhere that word vectors remain largely the same across languages. Does this make word vectors a "universal language?" This would have wild religious / philosophical implications. ๐Ÿ™
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

๐š๐”ช๐Ÿพ๐šก๐šก๐Ÿพ pfp
๐š๐”ช๐Ÿพ๐šก๐šก๐Ÿพ
@gm8xx8
1. yes, โ€œword vectorsโ€ and โ€œembeddingsโ€ generally refer to the same concept, w/ โ€œembeddingsโ€ being a broader term that can also apply to other types of data beyond words.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

๐š๐”ช๐Ÿพ๐šก๐šก๐Ÿพ pfp
๐š๐”ช๐Ÿพ๐šก๐šก๐Ÿพ
@gm8xx8
2. cross-lingual embeddings link languages but canโ€™t fully bridge linguistic & cultural gaps since they represent concepts / relationships mathematically rather than fully capturing the depth & nuance of human languages.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction