glbkst

@glbkst

10 Following

74 Followers

glbkst pfp

only checked warpcast sporadically the last weeks. Looking at the "Trending" tab briefly. 2 observations: - i don't think there is user growth - most accounts don't interact with replies, even if the number of replies is < 10 Ofc I understand if people don't reply, i don't reply to everything either, but it's strange that the app where at least some accounts interact most likely - independent of number of followers by the way - is X. Most others are 1-way communication channels. Warpcast was better with this a few months ago. At least rn: few users, close to no interactions => why use it ?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

glbkst pfp

Only how i see it, but i think both lens and also warpcast failed to grow users in a sustainable way. And an one-time paywall might even increase the number of bots and not decreasing it ? And if network effects kick-in, which might be rn the case on bluesky do some maybe better features of other apps matter? Probably not. It didn't looked like it only a few months ago, i tried bluesky and it didn't felt much used. It also had no video support. Maybe one will never know, why bluesky "won", but currently it seems to. The main issue here is, that there exist at least 3 decentral protocols: lens, farcaster and AT/bluesky but each has it's own accounts like Threads or X. And interestingly Threads didn't seem to have a real big benefit using the Instagram accounts. Which leads to the obvious question if many users care a lot about this. Sure large accounts might care about loosing followers or it only makes bot followers visible?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

glbkst pfp

Art is what you make it, it's subjective and everyone who wants to is an artist.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

glbkst pfp

the "white hat" is probably the only metaphor i understood, albeit late. Will there be more than one ? Ok, that fox might refer to MM, but it doesn't bring shoes 😂

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions