If you're unhappy with the new channels format — please reply to this cast with specific feedback!

The more detailed and specific, the better I can help solve your challenges.

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

1. My main concern is that the mod bots might go offline or their signer could be deleted, resulting in the loss of a lot of curation effort. Im also assuming these free bots will become paywalled eventually.

imo best approach here is for mod bot providers to use a signer on *your* fid. that way you can authorize multiple bot providers, just like you can use multiple clients with the same fid

🥷 at Senpi:  senpi.ai 
 | Your AI edge in the market — finding signal, auto-trading, mastering exits. Welcome to the onchain dojo.

memebuilding • prev manifold.xyz, twilio.com

building /hatsprotocol | 
proudly mid-curving it since 1995

Sounds like a good idea. If the bots go away, your signer is still owned by you and as long as you don’t delete it then the data is safe. @jtgi @betashop.eth what do you guys think about this?

Great, I'll make a note to reach out to you about it

Yep, I call it “bring your own bot” and already support it internally.

The onboarding story is bad so I don’t require it as a default.

Can get you setup.

Isn’t the same true if you revoked or deleted the signer you are using for the bot right now? I prefer for users to trust themselves instead of someone else.

I don’t think that works because currently if you revoke a signor key it removes all the actions done by that signor , so you’d lose all those likes done by the mod