Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
If you're unhappy with the new channels format — please reply to this cast with specific feedback! The more detailed and specific, the better I can help solve your challenges.
27 replies
6 recasts
72 reactions
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
1. My main concern is that the mod bots might go offline or their signer could be deleted, resulting in the loss of a lot of curation effort. Im also assuming these free bots will become paywalled eventually.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Spencer Graham 🧢
@spengrah.eth
imo best approach here is for mod bot providers to use a signer on *your* fid. that way you can authorize multiple bot providers, just like you can use multiple clients with the same fid
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Sounds like a good idea. If the bots go away, your signer is still owned by you and as long as you don’t delete it then the data is safe. @jtgi @betashop.eth what do you guys think about this?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
jtgi
@jtgi
Yep, I call it “bring your own bot” and already support it internally. The onboarding story is bad so I don’t require it as a default. Can get you setup.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
I don’t think that works because currently if you revoke a signor key it removes all the actions done by that signor , so you’d lose all those likes done by the mod
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction