If you're unhappy with the new channels format — please reply to this cast with specific feedback!

The more detailed and specific, the better I can help solve your challenges.

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

1. My main concern is that the mod bots might go offline or their signer could be deleted, resulting in the loss of a lot of curation effort. Im also assuming these free bots will become paywalled eventually.

imo best approach here is for mod bot providers to use a signer on *your* fid. that way you can authorize multiple bot providers, just like you can use multiple clients with the same fid

chef at moxie.xyz | Moxie is your onchain AI assistant—analyzing transactions, unlocking social alpha, and executing trades on your behalf.

memebuilding • prev manifold.xyz, twilio.com

building /hatsprotocol | 
proudly mid-curving it since 1995

Sounds like a good idea. If the bots go away, your signer is still owned by you and as long as you don’t delete it then the data is safe. @jtgi @betashop.eth what do you guys think about this?

I don’t think that works because currently if you revoke a signor key it removes all the actions done by that signor , so you’d lose all those likes done by the mod

We aren’t using signers for the Airstack bot 

we didn’t feel like the user should have to trust the bot that way to take any action as the user 

So we set it up only such that the user adds airstack as moderator

Isn’t the same true if you revoked or deleted the signer you are using for the bot right now? I prefer for users to trust themselves instead of someone else.

I'm pretty sure you can rebroadcast the same likes with the same timestamps with a new signer.

So just comes down to someone building the tool.