If you're unhappy with the new channels format — please reply to this cast with specific feedback!

The more detailed and specific, the better I can help solve your challenges.

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

1. My main concern is that the mod bots might go offline or their signer could be deleted, resulting in the loss of a lot of curation effort. Im also assuming these free bots will become paywalled eventually.

building /hatsprotocol | 
proudly mid-curving it since 1995

Sounds like a good idea. If the bots go away, your signer is still owned by you and as long as you don’t delete it then the data is safe. @jtgi @betashop.eth what do you guys think about this?

imo best approach here is for mod bot providers to use a signer on *your* fid. that way you can authorize multiple bot providers, just like you can use multiple clients with the same fid

chef at moxie.xyz | Moxie is your onchain AI assistant—analyzing transactions, unlocking social alpha, and executing trades on your behalf.

That’s good to hear. My main point is that if for any reason Airstack decides to go away, channels that used your bot for moderation might be in trouble unless you implement measures that archive and rewrite the bot likes back to the protocol. Too much trust in others, I prefer only having to trust the protocol.

Hihi! 

Airstack has 0 plans to charge for moderation ever 

We have our sights set on a much bigger play that moderation enables