Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Work in progress — the challenge with scaling quality in channels in a permissionless way. Pick 2.
25 replies
5 recasts
194 reactions

Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
This makes me wonder if there are any good examples on the internet where a platform has improved or maintained quality while also scaling. Maybe channels don’t need to have huge followings. I personally value quality more than anything else, but I did join FC for the permissionless benefits.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
My hunch quality > scale within any given channel. Not sure how to constrain this for overly broad channels which happens on Reddit for example. But if there were a way the mechanics incentivizes say splitting and decentralizing as it got bigger.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Maybe quality is achieved by granting read access to everyone while limiting write access to x number of users. You could also allow write access to everyone but impose restrictions on the number of casts users can make per day/week, and introduce various membership tiers.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction