Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Work in progress — the challenge with scaling quality in channels in a permissionless way. Pick 2.
25 replies
5 recasts
194 reactions

Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
This makes me wonder if there are any good examples on the internet where a platform has improved or maintained quality while also scaling. Maybe channels don’t need to have huge followings. I personally value quality more than anything else, but I did join FC for the permissionless benefits.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
My hunch quality > scale within any given channel. Not sure how to constrain this for overly broad channels which happens on Reddit for example. But if there were a way the mechanics incentivizes say splitting and decentralizing as it got bigger.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Splitting channels sounds like forking communities, and I’m not sure how that would play out if both channels cover the same topic. Another idea is to organize channels into hierarchical directories to create a sense of subcommunities.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Maybe quality is achieved by granting read access to everyone while limiting write access to x number of users. You could also allow write access to everyone but impose restrictions on the number of casts users can make per day/week, and introduce various membership tiers.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction