Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Top /music channel FIDs ranked by engagement using Eigentrust algorithm. Data sourced from @openrank. View the top 100 users here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vTTIzZO6udy6i61MOFvwLn9BtOqBhdpsF538yHj0q9HgrregtyAuRHtbpH8uvH4rnerHOy78tQHvzdy/pubchart?oid=678356686&format=interactive
9 replies
3 recasts
49 reactions

Tony pfp
Tony
@0xt0ny
Is this drastically different from the people who currently get engagement in that channel?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
It depends on how you define engagement. I think this algorithm uses interaction metrics to assign a trust score to each user, which is constantly being updated. This is how we get the ranked list
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tony pfp
Tony
@0xt0ny
My idea is to use this in a new mod tool to promote a different set of users in a channel. ignore powerbadge and overall openrank score and elevate the people who are best for a certain channel.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
> elevate the people who are best for a certain channel How do you plan on determining this?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Maxbrain Capital   pfp
Maxbrain Capital
@viybz
This gets tricky, especially with broad covering channels..but maybe something more straight forward like posting/discussing music is easier to distinguish.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Devs can use the OpenRank SDK docs.openrank.com/openrank-sdk and channel mods can curate a list of users they believe have a positive impact on the channel. You can then seed peer from these profiles and apply the engagement strategy, adjusting the weights for likes, replies, recasts, mentions, and follows to match your preferences https://docs.openrank.com/integrations/farcaster/ranking-strategies-on-farcaster
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Tony pfp
Tony
@0xt0ny
Right...that's what I thought you had done in your op
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction