Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

EmpiricalLagrange pfp
EmpiricalLagrange
@eulerlagrange.eth
We will be hosting our first AMA featuring the following PSE Projects (https://pse.dev/en/projects). Send in your questions as a reply to this case and the teams will try to answer them on Wednesday Feb 21st. A list of the projects attending can be found below πŸ‘‡
27 replies
97 recasts
470 reactions

NicoSerranoP pfp
NicoSerranoP
@nicoserranop
do you think ceremony participants should be public? E.g.: if I contribute to the 4484 ceremony. Would I want my address to be public or would I prefer to keep it private? Public pros: people can see who participated and trust they deleted the secret Anonymous pros: my support to specific projects remain private
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

eric siu 🐈 pfp
eric siu 🐈
@randomishwalk
what’s wrong with using a burner address and using TLSNotary to attest to / prove certain things about yourself to reinforce sybil resistance i suppose like zupass or gitcoin passport(ish)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Geoff pfp
Geoff
@geoffl
It's a good idea. Only drawback is that it needs extra work for observers to prove validity. And that introduces technical debt for the membership data and proving artifacts. We often want the ceremony to be provably secure to an observer many years in the future.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

eric siu 🐈 pfp
eric siu 🐈
@randomishwalk
the last point resonates
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction