Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
We will be hosting our first AMA featuring the following PSE Projects (https://pse.dev/en/projects). Send in your questions as a reply to this case and the teams will try to answer them on Wednesday Feb 21st. A list of the projects attending can be found below 👇
27 replies
43 recasts
226 reactions
NicoSerranoP
@nicoserranop
do you think ceremony participants should be public? E.g.: if I contribute to the 4484 ceremony. Would I want my address to be public or would I prefer to keep it private? Public pros: people can see who participated and trust they deleted the secret Anonymous pros: my support to specific projects remain private
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
eric siu 🐈
@randomishwalk
what’s wrong with using a burner address and using TLSNotary to attest to / prove certain things about yourself to reinforce sybil resistance i suppose like zupass or gitcoin passport(ish)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Geoff
@geoffl
Attacks that reduce confidence in a setup: 1: Coordinator fakes the whole thing and keeps all the keys. 2: Bots swamp the ceremony, their controller keeps the keys. 3: Someone bribes all participants to keep and hand over their keys (or variations). Solutions: 1: Public IDs; 2: Anti-sybil; 3: Anon contribs.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Andy
@andyguzmaneth
Imo, highest "authenticity signals" 1. Public figures (i.e. Vitalik, Tim Beiko, Dan Romero, etc...) 2. Anon figures with ZK identities (antisybil mechanisms make this stronger) 3. Anon with usage/interacition attestations 3. Anons without attestations
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
