Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

this is certainly a step in the right direction https://warpcast.com/v/0xbcbf6c0f

that said, there remains a need for a much more thorough (and thoughtful!) policy as it relates to spam and platform manipulation, more broadly

here is x’s, for example

this is certainly a step in the right direction https://warpcast.com/v/0xbcbf6c0f

that said, there remains a need for a much more thorough (and thoughtful!) policy as it relates to spam and platform manipulation, more broadly

here is x’s, for example https://help.x.com/en/rules-and-policies/platform-manipulation

I like running, poker and oysters | Founder, Social Forensics (SocialForensics.com) | Berkeley & UPenn | Learning to listen

We definitely shouldn’t be taking X’s lead here. They shut down legit accounts everyday with this policy and others, including my first Twitter account.

Making a FAQ like this with a few lines is a bad joke, especially in a space where transparency supposedly is highly valued.

Gives vibes of a single person project, the standards are clear if you pertain to have a social media network that polices content you must have a detailed policy about the whole process, otherwise is pretty much a mockery.

IMO lack of transparency in Warpacast project is huge, after months of taking hidden centralized decisions is better to not make a document at all than cede because of thousands of complains of lacking transparency.

A policy with practical zero enforcement mechanisms isn't worth the paper it's printed on...which is why I still assert cryptoeconomic spam protection is the only real skin-in-the-game mechanism that works