Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
26 recasts
27 reactions

Garrett  pfp
Garrett
@garrett
Smart Wallets only serve people who have never used crypto They don't serve 99% of people who have been onchain before and are active onchain daily or weekly If we want Smart Wallets to get adopted then we should make them work for the people that are actually active onchain
19 replies
6 recasts
72 reactions

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
my pet peeve with cbsw is how often sites opt to prioritize it over my actual wallet big turn off for using cbw for me
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Garrett  pfp
Garrett
@garrett
serving the marginal new user over the existing users
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Kyle McCollom pfp
Kyle McCollom
@kyle
“New users” = 1B. Not marginal. “Existing users” = maybe 1M We need to expand and be open to big changes, otherwise what’s the point.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
I mean I get it and actually support it - just gonna stop using cbw personally once other wallets work well with MWP Ultimately EOAs are currently dumb wallets, and using a smart wallet like cbsw doesn't drastically improve the experience if the experience itself doesn't leverage batched txs etc But catering to both effectively is gonna be something most devs will probably opt out of So really we end up with "dumb wallets" and "headless dumb wallets" something like 3074/7702 might help harmonize this over time, but for now the UX is only "marginally" better for the most part - only really impacting onboarding
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction