Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Gami ‪⌐◨-◨‬ pfp
Gami ‪⌐◨-◨‬
@gami
Very reasonable reasons to fork: ⌐◨ Not convinced DUNA as described, and at expected cost, provides reasonable ROI to Nouns ⌐◨-◨ Not convinced KYC requirement on grantees won't also be required of Nouns at a later date ⌐◨-◨-◨ Not convinced a single proposal cycle is a reasonable amount of time for Nouners, guilds, sub DAOs and delegates to seek their own legal advice, let alone make a well informed voting decision (especially without said legal advice being funded collectively by Nouners as foundation's is and was) What are your /nouns-duna concerns?
3 replies
3 recasts
10 reactions

Goldy ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Goldy ⌐◨-◨
@goldy
Where has it been said that a proposal will go live quickly without being a candidate or giving people time? I hadn't seen this anywhere, but have seen it alluded to by lots of people (appreciate your efforts to contribute to the discourse)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gami ‪⌐◨-◨‬ pfp
Gami ‪⌐◨-◨‬
@gami
during nouncil call 4156 said that proposal would likely go up monday. i think it's fair for people to be concerned. because there's been a lack of clarity all round
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Goldy ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Goldy ⌐◨-◨
@goldy
Ah right, haven’t listened to that so it wasn’t clear to me where this idea came from. Yeh obviously it’s fair enough for everyone to seek clarity. And I agree with your post that a single proposal cycle is not enough time to assess and vote for all members.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction