Gambid

@gambid

105 Following

524 Followers

Gambid pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Gambid pfp

Corollary to this: looking at the returns to scaling LLMs, the rise of AGI will drop the value of human work to near 0. A world with 90+% of humans jobless and desperate, and the inevitable stimulus in the form of UBI, is a powder keg for rampant online gambling

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Vitalik Buterin pfp

Vitalik Buterin

This (extremely off-putting) answer reveals a key thing that's beautiful about markets: They let people express the strength of their preferences without needing to always justify their values in front of a committee. https://twitter.com/DylanMAllman/status/1776649146675712146

62 replies

277 recasts

1451 reactions

Gambid pfp

I'll be happy to take Fred on for you, 1v1 on Guardian?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Gambid pfp

We live in the golden age of trading Assets are going to keep getting repriced with every new technological advancement Increasing volatility and things to speculate on as we approach a singularity https://x.com/openai/status/1772311389857571157?s=46&t=488Ld1Y4tp1dj46AKfmrtA

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Gambid pfp

https://x.com/gambidtheory/status/1719351553155592585

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Gambid pfp

Well balanced assessment, good stuff. Whether the mechanism design ends to being sound is an open question for me too, but the traction and network effects that come with it is difficult to ignore

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Gambid pfp

I believe @ai is hosting something

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Gambid pfp

Also agree it’s somewhat pessimistic, we’re compounding a few exponentials here — compute, funding, algorithmic progress, people interested

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Gambid pfp

Interested to hear your thoughts if you’ve read it. I think whether bittensor’s incentive design ultimately wins is still TBD, but it seems directionally onto something

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Gambid pfp

It’s a conduit for neg risk on Polymarket, the burn address for “No” shares

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Gambid pfp

Curious if you’ve taken a look at bittensor, it’s an interesting attempt at creating an incentive structure for open source AI

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Gambid pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Gambid pfp

Been doing them for a decade - best tip I can give is to do slow and controlled negatives + get to 10 clean chest high pull ups

1 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

Gambid pfp

Pretty good example of Goodhart’s Law

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Gambid pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Gambid pfp

I think it might’ve been @balajis.eth

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Gambid pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Gambid pfp

Why don’t people talk about Moloch more often? Most people seem familiar with the concept and feel it explains a lot of the organizational rot/bad incentive design we see around us, yet it’s not a popular concept people point to - why is that? https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/07/30/meditations-on-moloch/

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Gambid pfp

No better sign of PMF

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction