Gambid pfp

Gambid

@gambid

100 Following
472 Followers


Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
This (extremely off-putting) answer reveals a key thing that's beautiful about markets: They let people express the strength of their preferences without needing to always justify their values in front of a committee. https://twitter.com/DylanMAllman/status/1776649146675712146
174 replies
246 recasts
1373 reactions

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
I'll be happy to take Fred on for you, 1v1 on Guardian?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
We live in the golden age of trading Assets are going to keep getting repriced with every new technological advancement Increasing volatility and things to speculate on as we approach a singularity https://x.com/openai/status/1772311389857571157?s=46&t=488Ld1Y4tp1dj46AKfmrtA
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
https://x.com/gambidtheory/status/1719351553155592585
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
Well balanced assessment, good stuff. Whether the mechanism design ends to being sound is an open question for me too, but the traction and network effects that come with it is difficult to ignore
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
I believe @ai is hosting something
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
Also agree it’s somewhat pessimistic, we’re compounding a few exponentials here — compute, funding, algorithmic progress, people interested
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
Interested to hear your thoughts if you’ve read it. I think whether bittensor’s incentive design ultimately wins is still TBD, but it seems directionally onto something
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
It’s a conduit for neg risk on Polymarket, the burn address for “No” shares
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
Curious if you’ve taken a look at bittensor, it’s an interesting attempt at creating an incentive structure for open source AI
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
Gm
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
Been doing them for a decade - best tip I can give is to do slow and controlled negatives + get to 10 clean chest high pull ups
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
Pretty good example of Goodhart’s Law
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
gtao
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
I think it might’ve been @balajis.eth
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
Agreed
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
Why don’t people talk about Moloch more often? Most people seem familiar with the concept and feel it explains a lot of the organizational rot/bad incentive design we see around us, yet it’s not a popular concept people point to - why is that? https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/07/30/meditations-on-moloch/
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
No better sign of PMF
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
Gm
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gambid pfp
Gambid
@gambid
On 2), if the rebuttal against going virtual is losing military strength, what if this loses relevance over time? Extrapolating the costs of energy and intelligence trending to zero, and living in a post-scarcity world with high fidelity VR indistinguishable from base reality, I think this changes the logic of violence
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction