social

I haven't seen much chatter in here about Zuckerberg's letter admitting that Meta censored for the government.

Are folks not talking about it or why don't I see this in my feed or search?

Anyway...

I'm very curious as to why they decided to open up about it now.

The open web is dead, long live the open web. ⌐◨-◨

Building /warpcast and /farcaster

— gabrielayuso.com

Perhaps... Trump and many Republicans are still negative on Meta so being open about what their political opponents asked Meta to do and shining a bad light at the democratic party might help shift the image of Meta for them. Zuck likely would rather be an ally to them than an enemy especially since their policies might be better for Meta as well.

VCs bought the trump top I don't think he weighs in at this point.