Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Murtaza Hussain
@mazmhussain
Warpcast needs more content. That’s not a technical problem it’s a human problem — you just need more people naturally using the platform from all walks of life. They may be people you like or dislike but they and their interactions with each other make up the culture of the platform. The technical infrastructure is just like the physical infrastructure of a city, it’s there to facilitate what the people who choose to live there do. I never used the Twitter competitors like Bluesky because they just seemed to be the exact same thing as Twitter but intended to create an ideological ghetto for people who felt uncomfortable there. I prefer a messy mix of ideologies, cultures, and politics because that’s more fun and more intellectually challenging. Warpcast is worth migrating because unlike Bluesky it’s genuinely a different and superior interface for interacting with people. Now it just needs the people and I think it naturally would take off and become a mass platform if that is the goal.
34 replies
18 recasts
513 reactions
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
I think Farcaster shines when it feels like an asynchronous public group chat. Channels felt great early on because there were few of them. Now they have been spread too thin so it's hard for a channel to get enough conversational liquidity given the size of the user base and challenges in discoverability. It's a great foundation to build on though.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
