Models like o3 will be a huge boon for well rounded software engineers that think of systems and products end to end.

I worked closely with many brilliant people at Google, several of them with Ivy League PhDs that were expert mathematicians and puzzle solvers (held records across the Bay Area escape rooms). They were want o3 was benchmarked against.

I suck at all that yet I brought very different skills to the table which helped me get to Staff+ SWE even though I entered at the same level as a new grad without an advanced degree.

The open web is dead, long live the open web. ⌐◨-◨

Building /warpcast and /farcaster

— gabrielayuso.com

The true differentiators are passion, taste and the ability to gauge impact.

AI tools are definitely enablers, such as letting someone who can't draw generate an image, but they're mainly enhancers.

Passion drives you to keep at it.

Taste lets you drive the craft, direct it towards quality.

The ability to gauge impact guides you in selecting what matters most.

Without them, AI won't turn you into the best. But the best in each field will be enhanced by AI.

That'd be interesting to see.

Then there's this...

Building things that help communities build on the Internet /comint @tenfold
Past: AI and crypto rubinovitz.com

That'd be interesting to see.

Then there's this...
https://warpcast.com/gabrielayuso.eth/0xb67d689b

There is no system design or product engineering benchmark yet.

I am curious what the o3 score would be if one was added.