Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
best thing for nouns is if nounders burns their nouns
1 reply
2 recasts
14 reactions
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
75 votes is an outrageous amount of power. nouns is centralized. this duna election is showing it clearly
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
in b4 "no its not"
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
too bad none of these folks opinions matter because like 3 dudes can reach the max quorum all by themselves!
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Goldy ⌐◨-◨
@goldy
I don’t get it. Those three numbers add up to bigger than 75 and potentially less people than nounders… so why wouldnt it be the same problem if they were voting for something nounders were voting against?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
These folks don’t have the social influence nounders have. But yes, agree with your point. No vote should be decided by 3 voting bodies
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Goldy ⌐◨-◨
@goldy
Is your problem not with permissionless token voting then?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Goldy ⌐◨-◨
@goldy
Nounders burning their tokens just means janedoe.eth is now the centralised power. What’s the point?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
https://warpcast.com/frog/0x8529543a
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
@goldy maybe something like -- nounders vote for, and even though I might privately want to vote against, I'll vote for too so I'm not on the bad side of a group with extreme power and influence so when my mil+ prop goes up I don't fear retribution for having gone against the will of the powerful
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
