Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

gifting folks with no prior record of action in governance nouns has proven to be unsuccessful

prop 542 - nouns to seth, eric, chris, neil
"Their participation in governance will have a significant impact on our community"
noun 336 - no votes :( 
noun 67 - 15 votes, 2 vwr
noun 774 - 6 votes, no vwrs
noun 69, no votes :(

prop 525 - noun to john hamon 
"If awarded noun 778, John is eager to participate in governance, expressing interest in delegating his Noun to community members who support creative initiatives." 
noun 778 - no votes :(

prop 521 - matt downey
noun 301 - 69 votes :), no vwrs :(
would still consider this a success though

prop 610 - lets play nouns 
noun 895 - 6 votes
noun 863 - 3 votes
noun 754 - 6 votes

Crypto, nouns, malleable software, interfaces, running. // working on @agora // https://0xmcg.com // /the-pond

Not trying to be mean or call people out -- I just mean to point out that there are many ways to participate in governance without owning a noun, and when someone claims they will participate but they have no prior track record of engaging it should set off some flags

This is the tip of iceberg of the fraudulent shit that happens in nouns

Well, I think if there’s a proposal that is directly rewarding an individual, it’s easy enough to check their gov participation and its totally empty then im not convinced it’s going to be any different. Seems fine to chance the precedent that we’d expect the recipient to have participated in some capacity in the past.

I’m not bullish on the “it would be good for the brand for this person to hold a noun” case

Unfortunate precedent set that we can't walk back from.