Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
gifting folks with no prior record of action in governance nouns has proven to be unsuccessful prop 542 - nouns to seth, eric, chris, neil "Their participation in governance will have a significant impact on our community" noun 336 - no votes :( noun 67 - 15 votes, 2 vwr noun 774 - 6 votes, no vwrs noun 69, no votes :( prop 525 - noun to john hamon "If awarded noun 778, John is eager to participate in governance, expressing interest in delegating his Noun to community members who support creative initiatives." noun 778 - no votes :( prop 521 - matt downey noun 301 - 69 votes :), no vwrs :( would still consider this a success though prop 610 - lets play nouns noun 895 - 6 votes noun 863 - 3 votes noun 754 - 6 votes
9 replies
1 recast
25 reactions

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
Not trying to be mean or call people out -- I just mean to point out that there are many ways to participate in governance without owning a noun, and when someone claims they will participate but they have no prior track record of engaging it should set off some flags
3 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

Bixbite πŸ‘½  pfp
Bixbite πŸ‘½
@bixbite
Lets not forget all of the Traits props that are gifted Nouns πŸ§‘β€πŸŽ¨ 🎨 ..... gifting Nouns to people without an interest in governance dilutes active governing weight.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Andrea  pfp
Andrea
@lomelinandrea
Facts
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Andrea  pfp
Andrea
@lomelinandrea
Hey frog saw this as your comment on prop 684. I agree with the cast I even replied to it, but I don't I think it woud apply to us and why we are requesting Nouns as a community. We did the prop because we've done this before and thats exactly what we clearly explain in the prop. Hence the first line of your cast we DO have a record of participating in on-chain governance.
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction

jp.βŒβ—¨-β—¨ pfp
jp.βŒβ—¨-β—¨
@eusoujp.eth
I'd also consider prop 402 a success (57 votes, 79% vwr) as well, but yes, I tend to agree
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Bixbite πŸ‘½  pfp
Bixbite πŸ‘½
@bixbite
Dustin Yeller, Salvino, the transformer robot builder from the Reward the builders round, also Winter is hit or miss .....
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

wylinπŸ’Žβ†‘ pfp
wylinπŸ’Žβ†‘
@wylin
@jarmen someone did the math
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Lex pfp
Lex
@lex-
As a vwr for prop 684 I disagree, this is a request from a community with previous voting record that values ownership and belonging, with members being active for 2 years, vs gifting nouns to individuals that some hoped would attract some kind of benefit to the dao
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sasquatch テ pfp
Sasquatch テ
@sasquatch
first delegate for prop 610 was chosen mid-september and the other two were chosen at the start of this month. I am pretty optimistic about their continued participation in nouns. that being said there's been,... 30? (wtf) proposals this month so definitely not hitting the 66% voting participation mark we were aiming for with new delegates also the cohort of people who applied was pretty impressive... the ex-ceo of one of the largest esports teams did not even win a delegation spot in the nouns.gg voting process. since we plan to continue to rotate delegates, I expect some will be more successful than others as dao participants
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions