Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

frankie.base.eth pfp
frankie.base.eth
@frankieco.eth
🗣️🗣️🗣️
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
Interesting that you interpreted nouncil as a service to mean “bringing in experts” My interpretation is protocolizing nouncil to anyone can spin up something like nouncil with parameterized voting rules 😂
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

frankie.base.eth pfp
frankie.base.eth
@frankieco.eth
I think you’re missing the parallel I’m drawing here. Whether or not we fully embrace the concept of Nouncil as a service (or an alternative full-time structure), what Nouns really needs to thrive is consistent, full-time leadership and structure. Without that level of support, the potential of the project can’t be fully realized. It’s not just about setting up processes like Nouncil, but about ensuring there’s sustained leadership to keep things moving forward.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

krel pfp
krel
@krel
> what Nouns really needs to thrive is consistent, full-time leadership and structure you have the power to permissionlessly implement your vision here -- just go ahead and be/do that -- but youre unlikely to get any form of defined roles and consensus around this idea just talking about it
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

frankie.base.eth pfp
frankie.base.eth
@frankieco.eth
I am not looking for a role or consensus - I will continue to do the work in the background. In the meantime, I’ll continue to acknowledge these moments when there is force (and call-outs) for Nouns to level up, whether we like it or not. I'm just here to remind folks where we're inevitably heading.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction