Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Francesco pfp
Francesco
@fradamt
How desirable is the separation of beacon blocks from execution payloads w/o the other guarantees that epbs has been associated with? (unconditional payment, builder protection w/o relay) How much value do we get just by ensuring that an execution failure still leaves a valid beacon block?
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Barnabé Monnot pfp
Barnabé Monnot
@barnabe
It is valuable but it's not inherent to ePBS, this is a feature of execution tickets too, so imo this value should be weighed against alternative designs which achieve the same feature.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Francesco pfp
Francesco
@fradamt
I think we can have this feature by itself, without the whole epbs machinery. I think we can even do it in a way which is compatible with future more radical redesigns that separate consensus and execution slots (like execution tickets or regular epbs itself)
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

Anders Elowsson  pfp
Anders Elowsson
@anderselowsson
https://makeagif.com/i/y6YZEj
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

pintail pfp
pintail
@pintail
It seems as though the possibility of valid beacon blocks with invalid/missing execution payloads would somewhat mitigate the impact of execution failures so worth doing
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction