Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

timbeiko.eth pfp
timbeiko.eth
@tim
Unfortunately there doesn’t seem to be a ton of interest for L1 privacy. It’s obviously extremely complex, but I really wish we spent like 20% of the brainpower that we spend on “solving MEV” towards L1 privacy. The extent to which we may all just be building surveillance infrastructure is underrated.
9 replies
27 recasts
177 reactions

Ty pfp
Ty
@faultproof
If the demand arises, the privacy enabled blockchain/rollup/whatever will come if there’s money to be made by the builders. Don’t think this is something to worry about tbh
9 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Tyga pfp
Tyga
@tyga
I would say that this is true to a certain extent, but by no means is absolute. CEXs have to deal with countering money laundering practices, which has additional expenses and gov scrutiny, in effect makes CEXs highly resistant to listing privacy coins, which makes a huge hurdle for start ups to overcome.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tyga pfp
Tyga
@tyga
I would say that that statement isn't absolute. Costs of regulatory compliance and cost to combat litigation (or threat of it) creates a higher barrier to entry than most can afford. Established chain may not bother because enough people use anyways and don't want the additional headache.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tyga pfp
Tyga
@tyga
I would say that that statement isn't absolute. Costs of regulatory compliance and cost to combat litigation (or threat of it) creates a higher barrier to entry than most can afford. Established chain may not bother because enough people use anyways and don't want the additional headache.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tyga pfp
Tyga
@tyga
I would say that that statement isn't absolute. Costs of regulatory compliance and cost to combat litigation (or threat of it) creates a higher barrier to entry than most can afford. Established chain may not bother because enough people use anyways and don't want the additional headache.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tyga pfp
Tyga
@tyga
I would say that this is true to a certain extent, but by no means is absolute. CEXs have to deal with countering money laundering practices, which has additional expenses and gov scrutiny, in effect makes CEXs highly resistant to listing privacy coins, which makes a huge hurdle for start ups to overcome.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tyga pfp
Tyga
@tyga
I would say that this is true to a certain extent, but by no means is absolute. CEXs have to deal with countering money laundering practices, which has additional expenses and gov scrutiny, in effect makes CEXs highly resistant to listing privacy coins, which makes a huge hurdle for start ups to overcome.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tyga pfp
Tyga
@tyga
I would say that this is true to a certain extent, but by no means is absolute. CEXs have to deal with countering money laundering practices, which has additional expenses and gov scrutiny, in effect makes CEXs highly resistant to listing privacy coins, which makes a huge hurdle for start ups to overcome.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tyga pfp
Tyga
@tyga
I would say that this is true to a certain extent, but by no means is absolute. CEXs have to deal with countering money laundering practices, which has additional expenses and gov scrutiny, in effect makes CEXs highly resistant to listing privacy coins, which makes a huge hurdle for start ups to overcome.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tyga pfp
Tyga
@tyga
I would say that this is true to a certain extent, but by no means is absolute. CEXs have to deal with countering money laundering practices, which has additional expenses and gov scrutiny, in effect makes CEXs highly resistant to listing privacy coins, which makes a huge hurdle for start ups to overcome.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction